C.B. the vision of Sir RobertPeel “It

C.B. the vision of Sir RobertPeel “It

C.B.

P. is working, we need to know; are we solving problems instead ofreacting to them? Are police officers encouraged to leave their patrolcars and cooperate with the public? Do we have streets free of drugdealers, rowdy teenagers, soliciting prostitutes, predatory criminals,graffiti or drive by shootings? In conclusion C.B.P. is striving tobuild stronger more self sufficient communities, in which, crime anddisorder do not thrive.

Effective C.B.P. has a positive impact onreducing neighborhood crime, helps reduce fear of crime, and enhances thequality of life in the community; It accomplishes this by combining theefforts and the resources of the police, local government, and communitymembers. Crime prevention takes on renewed importance in C.B.

P. AND thecommunity becomes a partner to law enforcement in order to addressdisorder and neglect or other problems that can breed serious crime. Aslinks between the police and the community are strengthened over time, thepartnership is better able to pinpoint and mitigate the underlying causesof crime. Following all these principles we can at least attain a newsense of community and at best we can make true the vision of Sir RobertPeel “It should be understood at the outset that the object to beattained is the prevention of crime.

To this, great and every effort,of the police is to be directed. The security of person and property andthe preservation of a police establishment will thus be better affectedthan by the detection and punishment of the offender after he hassucceeded in committing the crime” . . .

(Braiden 120) WORKS CITED Braiden,Chris. “Enriching traditional police roles” Police management: Issues and perspectives.Washington, DC. Police executive research forum 1992, Pg. 108,120 Eck, John E. and William Spelman,” Problem solving: Problemoriented policing” in Newport News.

Washington, DC: Police executiveresearch forum, 1987 Pg xvi-xvii Kelling, George L. and Mark H, Moore”The evolving strategy of policing” Perspectives on policing.Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice and John F. KennedySchool of Government. Harvard University Pg 4-5 Kelling, L. George “Measuring what matters :a new way of thinking about crime and publicorder”.The city Journal, Spring 1992, Pg 21-22 Moore H.

Mark andGeoffrey Albert ” Measuring police performance ” in John Dijulio Sr, etal Justice System Performance measures :Princeton University Bureau ofjustice discussion series (forthcoming) Moore H. Mark and Malcolm K.Sparrow, David MacKennedy ABeyond 911: A new era for emailprotected Chapter4 Wilson Q. James ” Can the bureaucracy be deregulated? ” in JohnDijulio Sr ed, Deregulating the public service : Can the government beimproved?(Washington, DC. Brookings Institution Press Jan 1994 Chapterdraft pg 21,54) Magazine : Us News and World report Aug 2 1993. Title:Beyond ” Just the facts ma’am “Author unknown Presidents commissionon Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice , Title : Thechallenge of crime in a free society (Washington, DC: US Government printing office, 1967 Pg 97-103) Bureau of justiceassistance Publication: Understanding community policing ” Aug 1994Chapter 3 Pg 13,15