The table 5

The table 5

The table 5, 6 and graph 3 showed difference of VAS (pre-post) in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of VAS at less than 0.0001 The mean of VAS in group 1 was 0.99 with SD of 0.421 and The mean of VAS in group 2 was 0.61 with SD of 0.312.this indicate that there was reduction 0.38 in pain in group 1. Statistical U value was 6462, which was significant.
The table 5, 6 and graph 3 also showed difference of VAS (pre-carryover) in group 1 and group 2. Less Significant change in mean difference of VAS at less than 0.0001 The mean of VAS in group 1 was 0.57 with SD of 0.443 and The mean of VAS in group 2 was 0.28 with SD of 0.35.This indicate that there is reduction 0.28 in pain in group 1. Statistical U value was 9099.5, which was significant.
The table 7, 8 and graph 4 showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.94 with SD of 1.328 and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.92 with SD of 1.047.This indicate that there was 1.02 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 8898.5, which was significant.
The table7, 8 and graph 4 also showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.41 with SD of 1.625 and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.5 with SD of 1564.This indicate that there was 0.91 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 10222, which was significant.
The table 9, 10 and graph 5 showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-post) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by Tape at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by tape in group 1 was 0.21 with SD of 0.133and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by tape in group 2 was 0.11 with SD of 0.342.This indicate that there was 0.1 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 9284, which was significant.
The table 9, 10 and graph 5 also showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by Tape at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by tape in group 1 was 0.16 with SD of 0.138 and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by tape in group 2 was 0.13 with SD of 0.954.This indicate that there was 0.03 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 10199, which was significant.

The table 11, 12 and graph 6 show difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.33 with SD of 1.29 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.42 with SD of 2.889.This indicate that there was 0.91 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 11466, which was significant.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The table 11, 12 and graph 6 showed difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.63 with SD of 1.334 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.95 with SD of 1.07.This indicate that there was 0.68 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 11047.5, which was significant.
The table 13, 14 and graph 7 showed difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape at less than 0.001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape in group 1 was 0.17 with SD of 0.133 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape in group 2 was 0.12 with SD of 0.11.This indicate that there was 0.05 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 12529.5, which was significant.
The table 13, 14 and graph 7 also showed difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 1 was 0.14 with SD of 0.13 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 2 was 0.09 with SD of 0.95.This indicate that there was 0.05 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 12036.5, which was significant.

Related posts:

  1. BNUR – 315 CERVICAL CANCER Prepared By
  2. WORKPLACE VIOLENCE AGAINST NURSES WORKING IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS AT PUBLIC HOSPITALS LAHORE Submitted by M Salman Ijaz SUPERVISOR
  3. The effect of human papillomavirus on p53 and pRb in relation to cervical cancer Lance Good PDBio 325 – Tissue Biology Fall 2018 Abstract Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers among women throughout the world
  4. Table of Contents TOC o “1-3” h z u Chapter 1 PAGEREF _Toc515035474 h 2Chapter 2 PAGEREF _Toc515035475 h 4Chapter 3 PAGEREF _Toc515035476 h 14MCKINSEYS’S 7S FRAMEWORK PAGEREF _Toc515035477 h 14Chapter 4 PAGEREF _Toc515035478 h 19SWOT ANALYSIS PAGEREF _Toc515035479 h 19Chapter 5 PAGEREF _Toc515035480 h 21Design Methodology PAGEREF _Toc515035481 h 21Chapter 6 PAGEREF _Toc515035482 h 29Data Analysis
  5. Prolonged duration of treatment is one of the issues in the field of orthodontics
  6. The effect of lung flute training on functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Omnia Saeed Mahmoud Ahmed 1
  7. In the year 1940
  8. 2411095159385 JIMMA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE Examining the Impact of Tablet Devices in Digital Resources Usage on Academic Performance
  9. OPTIMAL POLYNOMIAL ELM FOR DETECTION OF NSI FROM SALIVARY SERS SPECTRA TABLE OF CONTENT HYPERLINK l _Toc4686 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT1 HYPERLINK l _Toc12334 ABSTRACT1 HYPERLINK l _Toc12459 LIST OF FIGURE1 HYPERLINK l _Toc29134 LIST OF TABLES1 HYPERLINK l _Toc12102 CHAPTER 1
  10. Research Method for Business A study on the impact of sexual harassment on employee turnover intention in the public sector of the capital city of Maldives Khadeeja Hussain Reg no
0
Research Paper
Categories
Recent Posts

©  2024 Campuscrosswalk. Built using WordPress and the Materialis Theme

x

Hi!
I'm Alfred!

We can help in obtaining an essay which suits your individual requirements. What do you think?

Check it out