### The table 5

The table 5, 6 and graph 3 showed difference of VAS (pre-post) in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of VAS at less than 0.0001 The mean of VAS in group 1 was 0.99 with SD of 0.421 and The mean of VAS in group 2 was 0.61 with SD of 0.312.this indicate that there was reduction 0.38 in pain in group 1. Statistical U value was 6462, which was significant.

The table 5, 6 and graph 3 also showed difference of VAS (pre-carryover) in group 1 and group 2. Less Significant change in mean difference of VAS at less than 0.0001 The mean of VAS in group 1 was 0.57 with SD of 0.443 and The mean of VAS in group 2 was 0.28 with SD of 0.35.This indicate that there is reduction 0.28 in pain in group 1. Statistical U value was 9099.5, which was significant.

The table 7, 8 and graph 4 showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.94 with SD of 1.328 and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.92 with SD of 1.047.This indicate that there was 1.02 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 8898.5, which was significant.

The table7, 8 and graph 4 also showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.41 with SD of 1.625 and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.5 with SD of 1564.This indicate that there was 0.91 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 10222, which was significant.

The table 9, 10 and graph 5 showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-post) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by Tape at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by tape in group 1 was 0.21 with SD of 0.133and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-post) by tape in group 2 was 0.11 with SD of 0.342.This indicate that there was 0.1 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 9284, which was significant.

The table 9, 10 and graph 5 also showed difference of opposite side cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by Tape at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by tape in group 1 was 0.16 with SD of 0.138 and The mean of difference of cervical rotation (pre-carryover) by tape in group 2 was 0.13 with SD of 0.954.This indicate that there was 0.03 increase in rotation in group 1. Statistical U value was 10199, which was significant.

The table 11, 12 and graph 6 show difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.33 with SD of 1.29 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.42 with SD of 2.889.This indicate that there was 0.91 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 11466, which was significant.

The table 11, 12 and graph 6 showed difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 1 was -1.63 with SD of 1.334 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by goniometer in group 2 was -0.95 with SD of 1.07.This indicate that there was 0.68 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 11047.5, which was significant.

The table 13, 14 and graph 7 showed difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape at less than 0.001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape in group 1 was 0.17 with SD of 0.133 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-post) by Tape in group 2 was 0.12 with SD of 0.11.This indicate that there was 0.05 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 12529.5, which was significant.

The table 13, 14 and graph 7 also showed difference of same side cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 1 and group 2. Significant change in mean difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape at less than 0.0001 The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 1 was 0.14 with SD of 0.13 and The mean of difference of cervical side flexion (pre-carryover) by Tape in group 2 was 0.09 with SD of 0.95.This indicate that there was 0.05 increase in side flexion in group 1. Statistical U value was 12036.5, which was significant.