The main component on how the transition from modern to postmodern thought define the interaction of idea and action is by all accounts in the formation of wariness and responsibility within men to heterogeneity and multifariousness which flows from several postmodern thinkers that unveil and trail how the promised harmony and unity by modern cognitive machinery have an ineluctable expense in that it denies the insolubility of dissonance and engenders the devaluation and discipline of others

The main component on how the transition from modern to postmodern thought define the interaction of idea and action is by all accounts in the formation of wariness and responsibility within men to heterogeneity and multifariousness which flows from several postmodern thinkers that unveil and trail how the promised harmony and unity by modern cognitive machinery have an ineluctable expense in that it denies the insolubility of dissonance and engenders the devaluation and discipline of others

The main component on how the transition from modern to postmodern thought define the interaction of idea and action is by all accounts in the formation of wariness and responsibility within men to heterogeneity and multifariousness which flows from several postmodern thinkers that unveil and trail how the promised harmony and unity by modern cognitive machinery have an ineluctable expense in that it denies the insolubility of dissonance and engenders the devaluation and discipline of others (White, 1988). This can be explained further in reference to Derrida and Foucault, two of the most prominent political postmodern thinkers and as such