PhD Synopsis 2018 Genomic characterization and synergy testing of various antibiotic combinations by checkerboard
PhD Synopsis 2018
Genomic characterization and synergy testing of various antibiotic combinations by checkerboard, time-kill and E-test based methods for carbapenem resistant Gram negative bacteria isolated from hospital acquired infection patients.
Submitted by
K.SreejaVamsi, M.Sc
Palamur bioscience PvtLtd ,
Mahabubnagar,Telangana-509001
Research Supervisor
Dr. SubramaniRamamoorthy,PhD
Palamur bioscience Pvt Ltd,
MahabubnagarTelangana-509001
PALAMUR BIOSCIENCES
PhD Synopsis 2018
Genomic characterization and synergy testing of various antibiotic combinations by a checkerboard, time-kill and E-test based methods for carbapenem resistant Gram negative bacteria isolated from hospital acquired infection patients.
Introduction
Hospital acquired (nosocomial) infections are accountable for serious proportion of extinction and desolation all over the world. Infection acquired during the hospital stay are generally called hospital acquired infections, initially known as infection arising after 48hrs of hospitaladmission 1,2. The origin of hospital acquired infections includes substances, crowd, food stuff , water and ventilation with in the hospital 3. A vast preponderance of these diseases are induced by multidrug resistant bacteria, therefore hinder the therapeutic options.
Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), though species may vary in their prevalence, are claimed as the predominant etiological agents in causing the four most common types of hospital-acquired infections namely Bloodstreaminfection, surgical site infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection. The bacterial disease burden in India is among the highest in the world 4, possibly not due to shortage of life retaining antibiotics but repeatedly limiting their clinical utility, therefore, exaggerate the desolation and death. Pneumonia remains the leading cause of death an estimated 5.6 million children deaths occurs in India each year 5, and is the leading cause of mortality in the children 6.
There is a radical development in the disease control practices, health care and antibiotic use and resistance might have influenced the frequency of these GNB. Drug selection pressure is the single most factors in the evolution of drug resistance in bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance is of global concern with significant impact in progressed nation where the spreading disease load is huge and cost constraints for the improvement of new drugs to tackle the risk. In spite of rapid advances in genomics and high throughput screening technologies, there exists a long intermission in the evolvement of new drug molecules.
PhD Synopsis 2018
Therefore, proper control and management of common and most serious infectious diseases have been critically compromised by the spread of resistance mechanisms among GNB.
The magnitude of drug resistance is directly proportional to the use of particular antibiotic in the community. Indiscriminate/inappropriate use of antibiotics even in situations where they are not expected to improve the patient’s condition, such as, the common cold and uncomplicated cases of diarrhea (which are appropriately treated with oral rehydration therapy) is another contributing practice for the spread of drug resistance. The reasons for selective pressure induced by the drugare multi factorial and involve both human and animal use. Although drug resistance is primarily a medical concern, the factors that influence the spread of resistance are ecological, epidemiological, cultural, social, and economic.
In most of the developing and developed countries antibiotic resistance has become a less priority when Compared with many other infectious diseases. Resistance against antibiotics are at high levels in certain places in India but the problem has remained largely unknown because of relatively few studies were published. However, the issue came to the focus when the New Delhi -Metallo Beta Lactamase-1 first reported in 2009.
Carbapenems are a class of beta- lactam antibiotics primarily intended to use for the treatment of infections caused by GNB. The most commonly used carbapenems are imipenem, meropenem, ertapenems and doripenems. These carbapenems have broad spectrum of activity and highly potent against multidrug resistant GNB. Because of their high efficacy, they are often used as last line agents in life threatening infections. These antibiotics are stable to undergo inactivation by beta-lactamases including the extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and AMPc produced by most of the Gram negative pathogens. 7 However, resistance to carbapenems developed by Gram negative bacteria has created a global panic thus, further limiting the antibiotic arsenal. 8
PhD Synopsis 2018
Resistance to carbapenems may be acquired by following mechanisms
Production of beta lactamases(carbapenemases) that hydrolysescarbapenems.
Changes in outer membrane porins that block the entry of these antibiotics.
Active pumping of the antibiotics out of the cell using complex efflux pumps.
Among these, production of carbapenemase appears to be the most widespread cause of carbapenem resistance. Carbapenemase have the ability to hydrolyze pencillins, cephalosporins, monobactams and carbapenems therefore, limiting the treatment options.
Based on hydrolytic mechanism at the active site three major classes are present. They are of class A, B and D beta-lactamases. class B enzymes are Metallo-Beta-Lactamases (MBL) that contain zinc in the active site. WhileclassA have serine at the active site. An increase in the prevalence of carbapenem resistance mediated by acquired MBL has been reported at high frequency, as the MBL genes reside in mobile gene cassetteintegrons.
The important Class B belongs to the SIM,GIM, SPM, VIM, and IMP families. class A include IMI, SME,NMC,GES and KPC families. While class D carbapenemases consist of OXA-type beta-lactamases frequently detected in Acinetobacterbaumannii 9.
Generally, in clinical microbiology laboratory, screening and surveillance of carbapenemase producing microorganisms is of high priority for the selection of restorative schemes and application of infection prevention measures. Therefore, any GNB with carbapenem resistant or intermediate sensitive should routinely be tested for carbapenemase production by standard methods.
The aim of the study is to identify the carbapenem resistant GNB from clinical samples and also to find the most suitable synergistic antibiotic combination that can be applied in clinical practice. We proposed to use a combination of phenotypic and genotypic methods for screening of carbapenemase production. Similarly, different methods such as, Checkerboard, Time-Kill and E-test have been chosen to identify the synergistic antibiotic combination for each of these resistant GNB.
PhD Synopsis 2018
Rationale
Multidrug resistant Gram negative bacilli cause significant proportion of life threatening infections, therefore increasing the mortality and morbidity due to limited therapeutic options. Although antibiotics like colistin, tigecycline are often used for treatment of these infections, monotherapy may lead to clinical failure because of various factors. Hence, clinicians often prefer combination of drugs over monotherapy for the proper control of such infections. However, there is a great paucity of information about the synergistic antibiotic combinations with respect to the diverse resistance mechanisms of frequently encountered GNB.Also, little is known about the prevalence of carbapenem resistant GNB in the Indian literature. Therefore, we anticipate that, this study may provide the mechanistic insights in understanding the carbapenem resistance and also authentication of a sophisticated methodology for selection of an appropriate antibiotic combination would be highly beneficial in treating multidrug resistant Gram negative bacterial infections.
Objectives
To estimate the prevalence of carbapenem resistant Gram negative bacilli from clinical isolates in our hospital.
To know the mechanism of resistance to carbapenems by phenotypic and genotypic characterization.
To identify the synergistic antibiotic combination using time kill assay, checkerboard and E-test and also to compare these methods for their optimal clinical utility to identify the most suitable combination against resistant microorganisms.
To select the most appropriate test method for immediate clinical application.
PhD Synopsis 2018
Materials and methods
Bacterial isolates
A minimum of 100 carbapenem resistant Gram negative bacilli will be isolated and identified from different clinical isolates collected in the department of microbiology. The carbapenem resistant organisms included will be Klebsiella pneumonia, Acinetobacterbaumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, E. coli, and Enterobacter species.
Antibiotics
The antibiotics involved for synergy testing will be colistin, tigecycline, rifampicin, imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, cefaperazonesulbactum, amikacin (Sigma Aldrich).
Antibiotic sensitivity testing
Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Gram negative bacilli will be performed by both disc diffusion (Kirby-baur) methods as well as by automated VITEK 2 system. Antimicrobial sensitivity will be determined by measuring the diameter of zone of inhibition according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations. The isolates which show resistant or intermediate sensitive for imipenems (zone diameter of 16-21mm) will be picked and proven for carbapenemase production.
Tests for carbapenemase screening
Phenotypic methods
GNB isolated from clinical specimens will be screened for carbapenemase production by adopting the following methods
Modified hodge test
Modified hodge test will be carried out by preparing a lawn culture of ATCC Ecoli 25922 and putting meropenem disc in the middle of the agar plate. The test isolate will be streaked
PhD Synopsis 2018
from the border of the antibiotic disk to the corner of the plate. After the incubation, evolvement of cloverleaf-like notch close to the disc is the evidence for carbapenemase production 10.
EDTA disc synergy test
It is used for phenotypic discovery of MBL production in clinical organisms . Imipenem disc will be kept at the middle of the plate with lawn culture of test organism and a filter paper disc soaked in 0.5 M EDTA will be kept at 10 mm distance .EDTA is a poly amino carboxylic acid which binds to zinc metal ionsand inactivate the MBL. After overnight incubation at 37ºC, the appearance of zone betweenthe two discswill be interpreted as positive for MBL detection 11.
Genotypic methods
All the bacterial isolates that are positive for carbapenemase production by phenotypic methods will be further subjected for genomic characterizationfor the detection of various carbapenem resistance genes such as; blaIMP, blaVIM, blaOXA, blaNDM and blaKPC by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
Tests to identify synergistic combination
The synergistic antibiotic combination for the carbapenemase producing GNB mentioned will be identified by using the following methods.
Checkerboard dilution assay
Time kill assay
E (epsilometer)- test
Based on the results obtained in the above tests, the synergistic/additive/antagonistic interaction of the antibiotic combination will be identified by using fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) methodology. FIC is selected because of its reliability, accuracy, economy, and adaptability to automated and semi-automated platforms and easy to perform.
PhD Synopsis 2018
Checkerboard assay
Checkerboard assays (CB) utilizesstandard powers (sigma erlich) antimicrobial combinations at different concentrations inthe micro-broth (100µl) method. For interpretation of the result, fractional inhibitory concentration index (FIC) is used. FIC is calculated by comparing the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of each agent alone with the combination-derived MIC. FIC ? 0.5 are considered synergistic; FIC in the ?0.5 to? 2 is considered indifferent and ?2 as antagonistic 12.
Time kill assay
Time kill assay (TKA) is astandard reference method for the determination of synergy between antimicrobial agents. It determines the actual reduction in the viable count of the organisms after exposure to the drug combination compared to the most active single agent at different time intervals. It is performed by adding the standard inoculum in the broths containing the individual antimicrobial agents and its combinations. Sub-culturing is done from the broth containing antimicrobials at different time intervals and the number of colonies will be counted. Synergy is then defined as a 2-log10 decrease in colony count at 24 hrs. by the combinations compared with that by the most active single agent 12.
E-test
E-strips containing gradient of antimicrobial agents have been used to determine the synergistic combination. The different versions of E- test methods are;
E-test cross method
E- test fixed ratio method
E- strip agar method
PhD Synopsis 2018
E-test cross method
According to this method, two E- strips, each with different antibiotic will be placed on the agar plate perpendicular to each other, intersecting at the MIC value for each antimicrobial when tested alone. After incubation for 18 hrs., the zone of inhibition is read and the FIC is calculated and interpreted as described for CB assay.
E-test fixed ratio method
In this method synergy will be performed by placing the first E- strip (drug 1) on the inoculated agar plate for 60 min and is then removed. A second strip (drug 2) is then placed in the same
place where the first strip has been kept and incubated for 24h.The FIC is calculated and interpreted as described for CB assay.
E-strip agar method
In this method, incorporate the active antibiotic (drug1) into the agar medium at a concentration specified and place the different antibiotic (drug 2) E-strips on the plates (four strips/plate) after inoculating the organism and incubate overnight. The interpretation of E-test synergy is based on the FIC calculation similar to that of CB method 12.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis will be performed by using graph pad prism software version 6.0. Data will be summarized by Mean ± SDfor continuous normal data and Median ± IQR for continuous non normal data/ordinal data. The comparison between the groups will be done by oneway analysis of variants test and followed by posthoc multiple comparison tests for continuous normal data and kruskalwuallis test and followed by posthoc multiple comparison test for continuous non normal data. All p values less than 0.05 will be considered as statistical significant.
PhD Synopsis 2018
Results
It is anticipated that, the phenotypic and genotypic methods proposed will identify the prevalence of carbapenem resistance in frequently encountered Gram negative bacilli and also optimal antibiotic combination that can be applied in regular clinical practice. Critical analysis of the data obtained may provide an opportunity for framing proper infection control and antibiotic policies in order to expand the life span of last line of antibiotics.
Outcome and significance
Completion of the proposed research plan is anticipated to yield information on the clinical utility and precision of the methodologies to identify the most appropriate synergistic antibiotic combination. This will further enable to screen more of such novel antibiotic combinations that a
readily available for effective management of Gram negative bacterial infections. It will also
help in finding out the distribution of specific carbapenem resistance genes among different bacterial species.
Better understanding the dynamics of synergy testing of various antimicrobial agents will help directly in the treatment of the patients and to reduce the mortality and indirectly to prevent the emergence of Multi drug resistance(MDR) pathogens and nosocomial spread of these pathogens in a hospital care setup.
Pilot study A six months’ pilot study was done for evaluation of carbapenem resistance in commonly isolated bacteria. samples were collected from inpatients of svs hospital and were further studied in palamur bio sciencepvt ltd.Initialidentification and susceptibility was done by both phenotypic methods and byVitek 2 analyzer (biomerieuxinc), to detect resistance to meropenem and imipenem and other non carbapenem antibiotics. A total of 66 carbapenem resistant isolates were identified from blood,respiratory specimens,urine,prospectively from all age groups and were preserved.
Expenses and Funding Financial approval is from Government of India, Ministry of science and technology KIRAN DIVISION ref no SR/WOS-A/LS-643/2016(G)
References
1.Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC,Hughes JM.1988. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J infect control. 1988; 16:128-40.
2. Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, gayness RP .1997. nosocomial infections in medical intensive care units in the united states. National nosocomial infections surveillance system. crit care med. 199;27:887.
3. Patwardhan RB,Dhakephalkar PK, NiphadkarKB,chopade BA. 2008. A study of nosocomial pathogens in ICU with special reference to multi resistant Acinetobacterbaumanniiharbouringmultiplasmids. Indian j Med res. 2008; 128: 178-87.
4. Global Antibiotic Resistance Partnership(GARP)-Indian Working Group* .2011. Rationalizing antibiotics use to limit the antibiotic resistance in India+.2011 Indian J Med Res 134, sep 2011, pp 281-294.
5. Mathew JL. 2009. Pneumococcal vaccination in developing countries: where does science end and commerce begin? vaccine 2009;27: 4247-51.
6. Levine OS,Scherian T. 2007Pneumoccoccal vaccination for Indian children. Indian pediatric 2007; 44 :491-6.
7.Wallace M et al.2011. Carbapenems Past, Present, FutureAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Nov2011; 55(11): 4943-4960.
8. PrakeshS. 2OO6. Carbapenem sensitivity profile amongst bacterial isolates from clinical specimens in Kanpur city. Indian J Crit Care Med 2006;10:250-3.
9. Kattan J.N et al. 2008. New developments inCarbapenems. European Society of Clinical microbiology and infections,14:1102-1111doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.
10. AmjadA et al.2011. Modified Hodge test a simple and effective test for detection of carbapenamaseproduction. Iran JMicrobiol. 2011; 3(4):189-193.
11.Kanchanadevi, P., and S Chandra Sekaran.2016.Importanceof EDTA in the detection of Metallo Beta- Lactamase from imipenem resistant gram negativebacilli. int. J curr. Microbiol .App. Sci (2016) 5(11):702-706.
12.Laishram et al 2017. An update on technical, interpretative and clinical relevance of antimicrobial synergy testing methodologies. Indian J Med Microbiol 2017;35:445-68.
