Moore’s thesis offers insightful details on the need to consider the stylistic language in scientific writing since rhetorical choices could significantly affect its overall impact
Moore’s thesis offers insightful details on the need to consider the stylistic language in scientific writing since rhetorical choices could significantly affect its overall impact. In his thesis, Moore tempts the reader to consider why Avery et al. (1944) made a significant contribution that even did not analyze or utilize by other researchers, while scientists reference their experiments that related to DNA structure to Watson and Crick’s (1953) work. Moreover, he provides brief aspects in which the scientific paper should be written and appreciated by different generations of scientists. His contrast between Watson and Crick’s (1953) as well as Avery et al. (1944) articles stress the need for scientists to persuade others. In such a way, he emphasizes the importance of effective arguments to improve the impact of a research paper.
Avery et al.’s (1944) article shows that the authors missed an opportunity for greater scientific recognition due to complicated stylistic language choices. Also, the sections and explanations are dense, dull, passive writing, and lack the precision needed for intellectual stimulation in scientific papers. Avery et al.’s (1944) paper is complex and not easily read and understood by a layperson. Furthermore, their paper content exhibits several complex words and unnecessary details. The paper layout is not persuasive, since insightful covered are not highlighted in the introduction or as thesis statement and fails to stress the importance of their work.
Watson and Crick’s (1953) paper illustrates how the scientific article should be written. Their paper is persuasive, backed by experimentation, and presented in simple language easy to understand by a layperson. Furthermore, their writing style is confident and accurate which grabs the reader’s attention. Besides, the opening statements are creating the anticipation to read more as the thesis is simple and precise. Therefore, the authors stated the importance of their work, affirming that the novel features are of considerable biological interest, adding weight to their discovery.
